Jacques Marie Mage X RMFC Glacier

Marsoni

M251S

$577.50

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Jacques Marie Mage X RMFC GlacierClassic alpine spectacles reimagined for the Rocky Mountain Featherbed for Jacques Marie Mage collection, handcrafted from 100% beta titanium with perforated eye shields, a leather centerpiece secured by a beveled snap, and interchangeable temple options. A classic mountaineering expression that draws directly from 1970s alpine spectacles and the devoted outdoor communities that lived in them, these limited edition spectacles from the Rocky Mountain

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Jacques Marie Mage X RMFC Glacier orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Jacques Marie Mage X RMFC Glacier ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Jacques Marie Mage X RMFC Glacier, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Jacques Marie Mage X RMFC Glacier in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

My initial review was 5 stars based on my experience with a previous order (blue raccoon) and the fact my puppy was immediately interested in it. However, I did not give it to her to play with until this past Friday (May 21, 2026) because she had the first one I bought. In a matter of 2 days the seam on the back and at the base of the head unraveled and all of the stuffing was scattered all over the room. I thought I’d found some good, high quality, toys for her but apparently this one was defective because the first one had had a lot of use and I’d still in decent shape. This is too much money to pay for a dog toy that only lasts a day or two so be advised they aren’t all good.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on April 11, 2026

Verified Purchase

J. Bush

West Palm Beach, US

★★★★★ 5

Bigger, louder, crinklier, softer, than expected!

Size: X-Large, Color: Rabbit

My dog was gifted a collection of used toys and he really likes a very long stuffed pig which, unfortunately, another dog that is a destructive chewer, totally destroyed. I decided to break down and buy him another long stuffed toy today and since he's always blissfully watching rabbits in the yard and neighborhood I chose the rabbit version. This thing is huge which is great for him- he's 62 lbs and 7 months old and only half grown. He loves it, it has multiple LOUD squeakers, lots of crinkly spots, and fun ears/legs to grab hold off. He's a big fan and it's made with K9 Tuff Guard which LASTS. Super soft and easy to wash. Update after 2 months- easy to wash and looks new after a washing. very durable so far, standing up to indoor and outdoor use. He is not a destructive chewer but whips them around, tramples on them, steps on them while running top speed and chomps on the annoying squeaker for hours. one squeaker has a hole and its tune is now slightly muted (thank god)

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on August 24, 2019

Verified Purchase

April

Phoenix, US

★★★★★ 5

So many squeakers!

Color: Squeaker Matz Gator, Size: X Large (Pack of 1)

I have 3 golden retrievers. They love this toy. While the head came off because they played tug-o-war with it, the rest has held up mostly for 5-6 months. At this point sometimes a squeaker will pop out. There are so many squeakers in this toy! However, they still use it for tug-o-war, I am surprised it has lasted this long. There is only stuffing in the head.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on June 9, 2026

Verified Purchase

L. Beck

New York, US

★★★★★ 5

Cute, durable toy.

Color: Squeaker Matz Gator, Size: X Large (Pack of 1)

It's about as durable as you can expect a stuffed animal to be. I have two new puppies who are still teething and they love these things. I got the Kyjen sheep mat version (it's a square shape, rather than the two rows of squeakers) for the little girl. Both dogs sleep with it in their crate and we take them on trips with us. I've gone so far as to open up the toy and replace the broken squeakers (costs about 5$ for 30 large squeakers). The rest of the toy is fine. Our german shepherd puppy absolutely loves the rattle that's located in the head of the gator as well. The rattle also helps initially getting the dog engaged with chewing on the toy rather than your clothing or furniture. Then they discover the squeakers and it's endless entertainment and a good distraction for your dogs. I haven't had any problems with the thin, decorative material that's represent the teeth, claws and back fins. It's a slightly thicker felt that's soft and flimsy. Honestly, I'm not worried about it. Even if they were to eventually chew these off, they're not a choking hazard. Our little guy has thrown up solid pieces of kibble that are larger and harder than this. Seriously now, common. The eyes are sewn into the head, so there's no risk of pulling them off and swallowing. I toss these in the washer on a gentle cycle to clean off the slobber and dirt about once every couple weeks and the squeakers are fine, though they sometimes have to dry out to be 100% functional again. It never takes long. Overall, I love the amount of squeakers just due to the breaking problem with have with single squeaker toys. Once they break, the dog loses interest. Which is also a nice way to train the dogs the difference between the non-squeaking kids toys. The dogs absolutely love this toy and wont sleep without it. When the fabric eventually wears out (not even a slight issue after a few months), I'll be buying another one.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on August 8, 2012