2003 Yamaha YZF R6 REAR SWINGARM BACK SUSPENSION SWING ARM 5SL-22110-01-00 BB539

2003 Yamaha YZF R6 REAR SWINGARM BACK SUSPENSION SWING ARM 5SL-22110-01-00 BB539

Marsoni

M251S

$40.00

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

2003 Yamaha YZF R6 REAR SWINGARM BACK SUSPENSION SWING ARM 5SL-22110-01-00 BB539Bike Breakers Canada 2003 Yamaha YZF R6 REAR SWINGARM BACK SUSPENSION SWING ARM 5SL 22110 01 00 BB539 This swingarm is in good condition with minor cosmetic flaws. The swingarm is dirty. 1 spool bolt bent,piece broke off underside.. Removed From: 2003 Yamaha YZF R6 with 26026 kilometers miles Please review all pictures to asses the condition of the item. Shipping We ship nearly all orders within 24 hrs and add tracking numbers to eBay as soon as we

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your 2003 Yamaha YZF R6 REAR SWINGARM BACK SUSPENSION SWING ARM 5SL-22110-01-00 BB539 orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your 2003 Yamaha YZF R6 REAR SWINGARM BACK SUSPENSION SWING ARM 5SL-22110-01-00 BB539 ships.

Need Help?
Questions about 2003 Yamaha YZF R6 REAR SWINGARM BACK SUSPENSION SWING ARM 5SL-22110-01-00 BB539, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for 2003 Yamaha YZF R6 REAR SWINGARM BACK SUSPENSION SWING ARM 5SL-22110-01-00 BB539 in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Great denim jacket for the price. It feels durable and well made, though the quality is not quite on par with higher end name brands, which is to be expected at this price point. The fit is true to size and matches expectations. It is comfortable out of the box and, like most denim, should become even more comfortable as it breaks in over time. The arm length runs slightly long, but if you usually find sleeves long on jackets, this one will fit similarly.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on January 21, 2026

Verified Purchase

Nicholas

Massapequa, US

★★★★★ 5

Great base to add patches to

Size: X-Large, Color: Black

I've bought this jacket twice now (lost the first one...). Great base for my DIY patch jackets. I buy an XL even though it's a size too large for me. It's a standard denim jacket, not much to write home about. Good pocket size, and I appreciate the functional chest pockets.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 19, 2026

Verified Purchase

Haley D

Waukegan, US

★★★★★ 5

good stretch

Size: 10 Long, Color: Dark Wash

Honestly, these are one of those surprisingly good basics—especially for the price. The biggest standout is the stretch. They’re really comfortable and move with you, so they don’t have that stiff “jeans” feeling. They hug your body in a flattering way without feeling too tight or restrictive, which makes them easy to wear all day. The mid-rise fit is also a sweet spot—not too low, not too high—so they’re super versatile with different tops. What I liked: Very stretchy and comfortable (almost feels like jeggings, but still looks like denim) Flattering skinny fit through the legs Easy everyday jeans—work, errands, going out Great value for the price What to know: Material is on the thinner side (more comfort than “structured denim”) They can lose shape slightly after a full day of wear Not the most durable long-term compared to higher-end denim Final thoughts: These are perfect if you want cute, comfortable, affordable jeans you can throw on with anything. Not premium denim, but for everyday wear—they definitely get the job done and are worth having in your rotation.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on April 10, 2026